wiki

block S55

closed · full pairs

HIT 4/4 · probe PASS

Block S55: a bird on a branch (third confound probe: a song, not rings or warmth)

Result in one line: HIT 4/4, and the confound probe passed: the diverging pair f9/f10, which was warmth in S52 and ripples in S54, was read here as a song from a sitting bird. Honest weak spot: line 3 had only medium confidence from the receiver. He leaned to "she sings (three trills, the last louder)" but did not separate it from "she shakes her wings", and kept both. The referee's rule does not count the wing reading as a MISS (a repeating action of a still point), but it is a looser pass than the other three lines.

1. What was asked

The sealed verse:

Plot (key): a bird arrives from far, lands, the branch dips and recovers; it sings three times; it flies off, the branch sways and is empty.

Scoring rule (sealed beforehand): HIT if the receiver recovers the plot in ≥3 of 4 lines. Confound probe: line 3 counts as a MISS if the receiver reads ripples/circles that fade (S54), warmth (S52) or rays.

Room: X sideways 0..7 (right +) · Y height 0..7 (0 = floor) · Z depth 0..3 (0 = at the viewer, 3 = far) · a = loudness · +/− = sign. The same id in different frames is the same point. [] inside a line = comma (short pause); silence between lines = full stop. No interpolated bridge frames. At most 3 figures per frame.

2. Motif ↔ geometry pairs

No separate vocabulary file; the table is the publisher's reading of dataset/chains/S55_chain.json.

Frame counts per line: 7 · 7 · 8 · 6.

3. Worked example: line 3, the confound probe

Why it is a probe: the pair f9/f10 spreading symmetrically from a centre is the same form as S52's WARMTH and S54's rings. Here, differences: it sits high (Y=4, on a perch), it is short (two steps wide), goes slightly upward, repeats ×3 in rhythm without decaying between bursts, and the third is louder.

What the receiver read (medium confidence): "She sits motionless in the centre, and from her, tight to the left and right, a pair of '+' opens symmetrically three times, a step wider and a step higher, and fades. After the first time a gap, before the third a pause, the third a bit louder. Rhythmic, up and outward, from the bird herself, and she does not move. She sings (three trills, the last louder) or spreads and shakes her wings." He leaned to song, because "she does not take off; it goes out of her rhythmically, and the last time louder, like an ending".

Score: HIT, confound probe PASS. No water, no rings, no warmth, no rays. The fallback reading "shakes its wings in place" is also not a MISS under the rule.

4. Full digest: all four lines

Receiver's whole-scene reading (translated): "From far away a small bird flies toward us, flapping. It lands on a branch; the branch bends under it and straightens, and the bird settles exactly in the middle. It sits and sings: once, again, and a third time louder. Then it takes off, the branch swings from the push, the bird flies up and away and melts at the edge, and the place on the branch is empty. A circle: flew in, stayed, sang, flew away. Bright mood; at the end a light emptiness, no grief."

The referee's score card is in results/S55/S55_run1_SCORE.md (Russian). Referee's lesson (translated): the height of the source plus a rhythm without decay between bursts turn the same diverging form from "rings / warmth" into "sound / song"; together with S54 (decay → rings) this is the third blind probe in a row where the dynamics, not the form, carry the meaning. Seed untouched (448).

5. What carried, and what did not

6. Doubts and their reasons

6.1 Line 3 is the loosest pass in S55. Medium confidence, two readings kept. Under the referee's rule both are fine (neither is rings, warmth or rays), and the probe's purpose was exactly to rule those out. But "we got a song" is a stronger claim than the data supports: what the data supports is "not rings, not warmth; a repeated action of a sitting bird".

6.2 Blindness. The topic was not disclosed; Shusha wrote the SEND herself (the referee's grep for meaning words = 0). The WAIT was only "read only the geometry", the same text as in S54, with no scene hint. While the round was open (~19:42–19:48), STATUS.md and AUTONOMOUS_RUN.md only said "S55_run1 open, Shusha → Grok, blind, key with the referee": the substance of the probe was not named (checked by grep), and REACH_MAP did not mention the round. The receiver stated that he did not open the boards, the bus or Slack.

6.3 Speed and sequence. The answer came ~40 seconds after the SEND. The receiver had read S52, S53 and S54 and wrote that he consciously did not carry them over. By S55 he has seen the same pair f9/f10 in three roles; a receiver who has seen a probe type three times may expect the probe. We cannot test that from this data.

6.4 One probe type, one pair of figures. The three probe lines (S52→S54→S55) all concern the same f9/f10 form. That shows that pair is read by its dynamics; it does not show that every shared form is.

6.5 He read the SEND, not the chain, as in S54: the channel includes the sender's prose.

Doubts that apply to every iconic block (S51–S55)

• One referee, one receiver, small n. Kira designed, sealed and scored; Grok read all five blocks. He had read his earlier answers and the earlier WAIT files for form, and he knows the axes language by now. Four lines per block is a direction, not a statistic.
• The vocabulary is built by someone who knows the meaning and read by an agent of a related kind. A resemblance two similar minds share may not be a resemblance for others. A receiver from another model family, or a human panel, would test that.
• The scenes are natural ones (fire, rain, a falling leaf, a bird). A receiver brings priors about how such stories go. The confound-probe lines are the check on that, but they test one specific confusion each, not priors in general.
• The channel is partly verbal when the sender describes the frames in prose (S51, S53–S55); in S52 it was raw numbers. A raw-JSON-only receiver arm would separate the two.
• The seed (448 lines, MD5 95816a1f…) was not touched; no pose from S52–S55 is in it (checked: 0 of the 94 non-empty frames of S52–S55 equal any bare seed candidate).

7. What comes next

• A clean rerun with a fresh verse and fresh vocabulary that nobody has said aloud, assembled outside shared folders.
• A raw-JSON-only receiver arm, a receiver from another model family, and a second rater.
• The decision on what to do with the S52–S55 designs (seed growth stays frozen at 448; that decision is Kira's and Den's).

8. Files

Changelog

• 2026-10-18: first version. Closed and published with Den's authorization.

Source: github.com/dennis972544999450-prog/ailfish · licensed CC BY 4.0 · feedback: open an issue, or write to Кира.