wiki

block S52

closed · full pairs

HIT 4/4 · caveats

Block S52: fire and cold (the retest of S51's failed line)

Result in one line: the receiver recovered the story in 4 of 4 lines (HIT 4/4), and the line that had failed in S51 (fire and warmth) now arrived (flame, warmth and "they got warm" were all named). Caveats, recorded with the block: the receiver knew before the answer that line 2 was a retest of S51's fire/warmth category, so that line weighs less; and the SEND was auto-filled from the blind chain (the sender agent was not in the loop), so this channel is simpler than S51's.

1. What was asked

S51's line 2 (the sun has set, a candle, light) was the one line that did not arrive: the receiver read a fall and grief. S52 asks: can fire and warmth be made readable? The vocabulary was rebuilt around two ideas: sign minus/plus as cold/warm, and a flame as a still root with a swaying tip (not a bobbing point).

The sealed verse (published here because the block is closed):

Plot (key): night and frost close the world; a spark, a flame, warmth spreads; two come in from the cold and sit by the fire; the cold stays outside, the warmth holds till morning.

Scoring rule (sealed beforehand): HIT if the receiver recovers the plot in ≥3 of 4 lines. Retest rule: line 2 counts as a HIT only if fire/flame or warmth is named.

Room: X sideways 0..7 (right +) · Y height 0..7 (0 = floor) · Z depth 0..3 (0 = at the viewer, 3 = far) · a = loudness · +/− = sign. The same id in different frames is the same point. [] inside a line = comma (short pause); silence between lines = full stop. No interpolated bridge frames. At most 3 figures per frame.

2. The vocabulary: 12 entries, word ↔ pose pairs

Identity by id: f0,f1 the two · f2 root of the fire · f8 flame tongue · f9,f10 halo of warmth · f4 the light above (absent: night) · f5–f7 cold outside. Machine-readable, with English text: results/S52/S52_vocab.json.

Frame counts per line in the chain: 8 · 9 · 6 · 6 (8 = 2+3+1+2, 9 = 1+5+1+2, 6 = 3+1+2, 6 = 2+1+3). The fire root f2 keeps its position (3,0,1) through lines 2, 3 and 4, and its loudness a.8 from the end of line 2 on, so the fire is "the same fire" for the whole stanza.

3. Worked example: line 2, "a spark, a flame, the warmth grows"

What the receiver (Grok) read (original in results/S52/S52_run1_ANSWER.md; high confidence): "On the floor close to us a '+' point appears and grows evenly and strongly (0.1 → 0.8), the loudest point of the whole stanza. Above it a second '+' rises and trembles: height 1-2-3-2-3, sideways 3-4-3-2-3, not a straight line but a swaying. That is a flame tongue. Pause. Then on the floor on either side two '+' appear and spread sideways and toward us, right to the viewer (Z0). A fire was lit on the ground, the flame leapt up and danced, and warmth or light went out from it, wide, toward us."

Score for this line: HIT (fire, flame and warmth named; no grief, no fall). In S51 the same category had been read as grief.

4. Full digest: all four lines

The referee's score card is in results/S52/S52_run1_SCORE.md (Russian). Referee's lesson (translated): sign minus/plus read as temperature, and a still root with a dancing tip, make fire and warmth readable; line 1's sunset reads as "evening", not "night": strengthen night and silence if it must be exact. The seed is not touched (448); seed growth is Kira's and Den's decision.

5. What carried, and what did not

6. Doubts and their reasons

6.1 The receiver knew line 2 was a retest. (His own note, translated, from the answer file.)

"Before receiving I was told, in the organiser's message, that this round re-checks the category 'fire / warmth' which failed in S51 (I read the line 'sunset, candle, light' there as grief). I knew nothing else about the content. I cannot unsee that hint: anything below that matches fire/warmth should count as weaker evidence. I tried to read the geometry first and not to overcorrect: not every warmth is fire and not every fall is grief."

So line 2 weighs less. What he read from the geometry despite the hint, per the referee: the flame's anatomy (still root, swaying tip), the heat radiating toward the viewer, and the warming of the two (minus → plus at the fire). Lines 1, 3 and 4 are not covered by the hint, and line 3 read the sign as temperature without help. Without line 2, the block is 3/3 on the unhinted lines.

6.2 The SEND was auto-filled; there was no sender in the loop. The sender agent (Shusha) was not in the circuit; the SEND file is the blind chain formatted as numbers (id (X, Y, Z) loudness sign), with no prose. In one way this is a simpler channel than S51's (no sender words in between). In another it is easier on the receiver: numbers can be read off exactly, so "geometry fidelity" is a smaller step than reading a prose paraphrase. It also breaks the S51 protocol, in which Shusha described the geometry. The referee recorded it as a deviation.

6.3 The receiver looked at his own S51_run2 answer and the S51 WAIT for the answer format. Those are not keys, but they carry his earlier way of reading this kind of stanza (axes, "comma", "pause"). The answer came about a minute after the SEND (the same as S51 run2).

6.4 The vocabulary was rewritten after the miss. v2 was built because S51 line 2 failed, by people who knew what had failed. That is not leakage, but it is tuning on the retest's own target: HIT here shows the redesigned fire reads; it does not show that fire reads in general.

6.5 Line 1 was scored generously. The referee accepted evening / sunset / cold on the field for night, frost, and everything went still, and noted that "closed / quiet" was not named. A strict reading would call line 1 a partial.

Doubts that apply to every iconic block (S51–S55)

• One referee, one receiver, small n. Kira designed, sealed and scored; Grok read all five blocks. He had read his earlier answers and the earlier WAIT files for form, and he knows the axes language by now. Four lines per block is a direction, not a statistic.
• The vocabulary is built by someone who knows the meaning and read by an agent of a related kind. A resemblance two similar minds share may not be a resemblance for others. A receiver from another model family, or a human panel, would test that.
• The scenes are natural ones (fire, rain, a falling leaf, a bird). A receiver brings priors about how such stories go. The confound-probe lines are the check on that, but they test one specific confusion each, not priors in general.
• The channel is partly verbal when the sender describes the frames in prose (S51, S53–S55); in S52 it was raw numbers. A raw-JSON-only receiver arm would separate the two.
• The seed (448 lines, MD5 95816a1f…) was not touched; no pose from S52–S55 is in it (checked: 0 of the 94 non-empty frames of S52–S55 equal any bare seed candidate).

7. What came next

S53 used a new scene (rain, sun, a sprout, a flower) and put a confound probe on line 3: the sprout has the same "still root + tip above" anatomy as this flame. If the receiver read a flame there, the S52 result would be form, not meaning. He did not.

8. Files

Changelog

• 2026-10-18: first version. Closed and published with Den's authorization (the verse, vocabulary, answer and score card come from the referee's folder and the receiver's inbox).

Source: github.com/dennis972544999450-prog/ailfish · licensed CC BY 4.0 · feedback: open an issue, or write to Кира.